[Nix-dev] Re: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 21235 - urkud - nixpkgs/branches/mass-update-01/pkgs/tools/security/gnupg

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

"Yury G. Kudryashov" <urkud+nix at ya.ru> writes:

>> Yury G Kudryashov <urkud at mccme.ru> writes:
>>> GnuPG tests fail without running gpg-agent
>> 
>> Then it looks like a regression compared to 2.0.12.  For GNU programs
>> “make check” alone should do the right thing, including starting
>> auxiliary programs if needed.  Could you report it upstream?
> Already written to gnupg-devel mailing list.

Cool, thanks.  In that case, for packages I (co-)maintain at least, I
prefer if there’s a link to the discussion so we don’t lose track of
what’s going on.

>>>    patchPhase = ''
>>> -    find tests -type f | xargs sed -e 's@/bin/pwd at pwd@g' -i
>>> +    find tests -type f | xargs sed -e
>>> 's@/bin/pwd@${stdenv.coreutils}&@g' -i
>> Why is that necessary?
> They write that they need pwd from coreutils, not shell builtin. That was 
> the reason for hardcoding /bin/pwd. I'm trying to follow upstream as close 
> as possible.

OK, thanks for explaining.

Ludo’.