[Nix-dev] Re: [Want to commit tonight or tomorrow] overriding gnome components

Michael Raskin 7c6f434c at mail.ru
Tue Sep 7 11:05:19 CEST 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/03/2010 09:38 AM, Michael Raskin wrote:
> 		Hello.
> 	We have some package sets (like gnome) that reside in their own
> all-packages.nix-like expressions. If we need to do a full override ...
> 	I assume that just taking solution from all-packages.nix (__overrides)
> should be good enough.
> 	Does anyone have a better solution? One option is to port these to
> callPackage, too (when it becomes useful to anyone).
> 	If I get no recommendations, I plan to just use the top-level-like
> solution for gnome-2.28.

Given that Eelco committed override fixes on all-packages.nix I am
planning to re-test the top-level-style gnome overrides with current
trunk (instantiation shouldn't change) and commit them late tonight or
tomorrow. I believe that changes have low impact and no objections were
seen.. (Yury confirmed that he found his idea no better than mine)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMhgBOAAoJEE6tnN0aWvw31tIH/1DTNRkb5MuLKRg1pGU5qUrr
svYtXKAMPCsVLWtmFfAeKd7T3+sOtJ+JdLrrPc6tXG2KVhy6m1QtLQejfBH5mhXK
6nz37KAIgn2SxLOTfb4F1DsaZ6fSPzC7ne1Dj4N1Jj4QAzEIFSCsce+dPY2xoxOF
9045W9esoTwitp3zrE+LHTb70N66PIEMLgqUurClHbPG32kExaqJq9kzdFltbRT1
XOQrY7ehG/nHXs+WR9RZbiE7bj397c1EopShHpm5DPdOkLJ/oDvgCJPAH3q2U10f
nSs9lx4a+zOFw/ZgMVmOD3VBARwwdIf2YgB71DQ71/OgCw9QYzeOZjf9wApMDak=
=SleT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the nix-dev mailing list