[Nix-dev] python-x.y.z-wrapper vs python-x.y.z-full

[Florian Friesdorf]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:13:33 +0200, ludo at gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net> skribis:
> 
> > the attribute name for pythonXYFull is python-X.Y.Z-wrapper.  I'd
> > consider python-X.Y.Z-full to be more intuitive. Anything against
> > renaming?
> 
> I don’t have a strong opinion, but I think “python-X.Y.Z” alone is even
> more intuitive.  In general adding something after the version number
> looks odd to me, and it breaks strverscmp(3) and such like.

Without opinion whether this is good: Without suffix is currently used
by pythonXY, a python without internal modules that have external
dependencies.

-- 
Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net>
  GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D  BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20111015/7091e431/attachment.bin