[Nix-dev] fetchgit - why sha256 protection?

Malcolm Matalka mmatalka at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 13:47:48 CET 2012


Could fetchgit handle that on its own though?

Also, at least for github, if you want to install a specific tag, which
isn't always the case, you can link to the .zip copy of it from the
github page.

/M

Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> writes:

> Is it terribly difficult to run nix-prefetch-git? Built-in vcs-specific support doesn't strike me as simplification.
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Joachim Schiele <js at lastlog.de> wrote:
>
>> ----- Original message ----- 
>> > Excerpts from Eelco Dolstra's message of Mon Nov 19 11:36:00 +0100 2012: 
>> > > No.  "fetchgit" won't work if it's not a fixed-output derivation, 
>> > > because it won't necessarily have network access (it might run in a 
>> > > chroot). 
>> > Again: I'm not talking about the current state. I'm aware about how it 
>> > works. 
>> > I'm talking about: 
>> > "Does it make sense to introduce a special fixed hash for git repos" or 
>> > "what about implementing git checkouts natively so that passing the 
>> > git's hash is enough"? 
>> > git sources are very common today. 
>> 
>> True, simplification sounds like a good idea. 
>> 
>> 
>> > Marc Weber 
>> > _______________________________________________ 
>> > nix-dev mailing list 
>> > nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl 
>> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


More information about the nix-dev mailing list