[Nix-dev] nixos-unstable channel update!

Kirill Elagin kirelagin at gmail.com
Sat Apr 11 13:35:17 CEST 2015


I wasn’t aware of problems with channels updates, so could anyone explain
in a few lines what was going on?

Some weeks ago I needed a more recent version of nixpkgs than the one that
was available on the channel, so I picked the most successful evaluation of
nixpkgs:trunc, checked it out locally and setup binary caches to point to
hydra. Then I rebuilt my whole environment from this checkout and have been
using it ever since.
Now, when I heard that the channel was updated, I decided to give it a
shot, updated channels and… nothing changed. So I checked the hashes and,
turns out, the channel was updated to exactly the same commit that I was
successfully using (i.e. nothing had to be built locally) for weeks.

So, what exactly wasn’t working?

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 6:43 PM Domen Kožar <domen at dev.si> wrote:

> Yes, it's mainly about establishing the feedback loop without too much
> spam.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Peter Simons <simons at cryp.to> wrote:
>
>> One obvious improvement, IMHO, would be to send Hydra failure
>> notifications
>> from the test job to this mailing list to make sure we are aware of
>> failures
>> within a relatively short time after the commit that caused them.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20150411/a6fe6111/attachment.html 


More information about the nix-dev mailing list