[Nix-dev] patch: eclipse version 4.6

Layus layus.on at gmail.com
Sun Jul 3 19:18:28 CEST 2016


Most patches cannot break master.
This is not a monolithic software.
Patches may break a package, or a few of them, but not "master" as a whole.

If the patch modifies a widely used package or something more risky,
then a local buid it usually the way to go, unless Travis got it green.

-- Layus.

On 03/07/16 18:18, Azul wrote:
>
> so what do you guys use as a quality gate then?
> how do you make sure a patch won't break master? are you just testing 
> it locally on your machines?
>
> - curious
>
> On 3 Jul 2016 16:27, "Bjørn Forsman" <bjorn.forsman at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bjorn.forsman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 3 July 2016 at 17:20, Azul <mail at azulinho.com
>     <mailto:mail at azulinho.com>> wrote:
>     > n00b to the nix community so forgive my ignorance here.
>     > is this the correct way to submit patches to nixpkgs ?
>     > I attempted a PR some time ago which I never managed to get to build
>     > properly on Travis or identify why the Travis build scripts
>     failed the the
>     > build , so I scrapped it all together. Being new to nix and
>     being very short
>     > of time meant I didn't have the opportunity to debug it
>     properly. I could
>     > say I read some sort of contributor guidelines which lead to
>     follow the
>     > usual github PR, test, wait for green and ask for a review but
>     maybe I just
>     > dreamed it up or I was thinking of some other open source project?
>     >
>     > so what is the best way to send patches to nix in a sane and
>     safe way that
>     > won't break master ?
>
>     In general the best way is github PRs. But patches on the mailing list
>     may be applied too. Someone just have to do it...
>
>     The Travis builds are unfortunately failing a lot. It is my feeling
>     that most devs will look at PRs even if Travis are failing.
>
>     - Bjørn
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/attachments/20160703/6790f579/attachment.html>


More information about the nix-dev mailing list