[Nix-dev] [***SPAM***] Re: On commit naming conventions

Arseniy Seroka ars.seroka at gmail.com
Thu May 5 12:10:13 CEST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I agree with it.

On 5 May 2016 13:02:46 GMT+03:00, "Tomasz Czyż" <tomasz.czyz at gmail.com> wrote:
>Huh, so oh the other hand, maybe some "cancellation policy" can be
>added.
>
>"If there is no code change in PR for more than 3 months close it."
>
>(myself has two similar PRs, one is waiting for review/acceptance for
>quite
>a long time, the other one is waiting for me to implement it - maybe
>this
>can make things moving faster?)
>
>2016-05-05 10:42 GMT+01:00 Michael Raskin <7c6f434c at mail.ru>:
>
>> >I'm working with PR for more than 1,5 years. I saw maybe once that a
>> person completely lost his interest.
>>
>> It depends on the scope of «lost interest»
>>
>> I have seen many open PRs with minor problems to fix; these were from
>> people who later got commit access and never finished some of their
>> early submissions (I assume they didn't have time right after getting
>> a suggestion to fix something, forgot or lost interest later and
>> probably didn't use the code afterwards). Many of these were old
>enough
>> to have merge conflicts.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev at lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Tomasz Czyż
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFDBAEBCgAtJhxBcnNlbml5IFNlcm9rYSA8YXJzLnNlcm9rYUBnbWFpbC5jb20+
BQJXKxwFAAoJEMTxMd9/e0DjCIQH/1k3mj7E/9DYSbSnvYZBMF/iPjZ0Nw3X6eVF
xH61mDp5kHw4bZ5Z0exMbBy43aaMZuBClC2ZGJ8y5qkwuDpE6/QGS3GZVvGRBzDq
e3ncaj1PPRy+z9lgUFqErQ2BlEAQ6KaHR89Ph3EhlKR6o212oyGMS7AD30ZejWdT
Af3bgHdk/xep53f9+VgvVCPJ6Jk4iP8AdHA9vxar06W2fYQ5JEJ0PpuEbKl+wRMT
KkL/NMLbyL3TcwBUxG3m2Y+aAdZ5SMjWTNHXhZmltO5Ttbliw4DeLlD7wr+2BV4d
+lHY87VGUwLm6UZ/XbG9WmMLBH9nh+C5QPhN0RW/l/kAQWJR+P8=
=qZsg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the nix-dev mailing list