[Nix-dev] monitor.nixos.org

Profpatsch mail at profpatsch.de
Mon Nov 28 21:34:11 CET 2016


On 16-11-28 05:04pm, phreedom at yandex.ru wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2016 13:32:16 Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> > 2016-11-28 13:18 GMT+00:00 Profpatsch <mail at profpatsch.de>:
> > debian has such a strategy:
> > - https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch
> 
> That happens to not work all that well:
> https://github.com/Phreedom/nixpkgs-monitor/blob/master/debian-watchfiles/watchfiles.md
> 
> It turns out that debian watchfiles were much less reliable at getting updates 
> from SourceForge, than a generic SourceForge updater. This is because naming 
> schemes change, devs forget to update the updater script and lots of other 
> tiny but important reasons.

Since we have a unified packageset written in a turing-complete language
we can do a lot better. e.g. lib.updaters.updateSourceForge

-- 
Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on NixOS.
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.


More information about the nix-dev mailing list